Fonts v. Southern Pacific Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order denying a new trial William H. Waste, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Appellant has not pointed out any inaccuracy in the statement of facts as made by respondent, and it may be accepted substantially as the basis for a consideration of the legal questions argued by counsel. That statement, as far as any conflict exists, is the deduction from the testi many favorable to respondent, but, of course, no valid objection on that account can be urged to our according it full credit, since it is not inherently improbable. The action was on account of personal injuries received by plaintiff while in the employment of defendant in assisting in the removal of a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Howland v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Callan v. BullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Evans v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Meily v. St. Louis & San Franoisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- Dyas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wells Truckways, Ltd. v. CebrianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Burch v. Valley Motor Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Pitt v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Wallace v. SpeierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Estate of RowleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.