Legal Opinion

Thomas v. City National Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1894No. 5542PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from» the district court of Adams county. Tpied below before Gaslin, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

The'plaintiff in error sued the defendant in error, a national bank, alleging that on January 21, 1889, one EIsmore and one Knowlton made and delivered to Charles H. Paul certain promissory notes secured by real estate mortgage of the same date; that Paul in the ordinary course of business indorsed and delivered the notes to the bank; that the bank executed and delivered to plaintiff a guaranty as follows:

“ For value received, we hereby assign and transfer the within note .to Joseph Thomas, trustee, and guaranty payment of the principal and interest on the same on the terms alud…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People's Bank v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Rich v. State National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Henderson Tire & Rubber Co. v. GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  2. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America v. Fairbanks Steam Shovel Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925
  3. City National Bank v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Ellis v. Citizens' National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  5. United States Nat. Bank v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API