Legal Opinion
Henderson Tire & Rubber Co. v. Gregory
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 22, 1926No. 7342, 7349PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOOTH, Circuit-Judge.
The appeal by the Henderson Tire & Rubber Company, hereafter called Henderson Company, is from so much of the decree of May 11, 1925, made by the court below on the intervening petition of said company in a creditor’s bill (No. 321), as disallowed impart its claim. The appeal by the receiver appointed in said creditor’s bill is from so much of the same decree as allowed in part the claim of the Henderson Company. The salient facts are as follows:
On January 13,1922, appellee Charles E. Gregory filed in the court below two bills in equity in the nature of creditor’s bills —…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. HutchinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Friederichsen v. RenardSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Robb v. VosSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. 93.970 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- Elbert v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Davis v. HauschildSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Franciscan Hotel Co. v. Albuquerque Hotel Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
- Wolak v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1973
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.