People's Bank v. National Bank
Supreme Court of the United States
Ebbob to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swayne
This case was submitted to the court without the intervention of a jury. The court found the facts and gave judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff thereupon sued out this writ of error and brought the case here for review. The act of Congress regulating the procedure adopted seems to have been carefully complied with.
The People’s Bank of Belleville, plaintiff,, and the Manufacturers’ National Bank of Chicago, defendant, in the court below, are respectively the plaintiff and the defendant in error here. For convenience, we shall speak of them in this opinion by their former designations. ■
Th…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
3Cited by94 opinions
- Cochran & Sayre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Auten v. United States Nat. Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Fort Scott v. HickmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Knass v. Madison & Kedzie State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
- Nowel v. Equitable Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.