Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Odland

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1939No. 27520. Department TwoPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Plaintiffs, Harry S. and Bessie Bowen, sued Henry and Alice Odland for damages on account of injuries suffered by Mrs. Bowen as the result of a collision between plaintiffs’ automobile, driven by Mrs. Bowen, and defendants’ automobile, driven by Mrs. Odland. In their complaint, plaintiffs demanded judgment for fifty thousand dollars on account of Mrs. Bowen’s injuries, and over $2,200 on account of damages to their automobile and other incidental items. Defendants cross-complained for damages to their automobile in the sum of $225.

The action was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. HadenfeldtWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Martin v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Hoenig v. KohlWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Sather v. BlodgettWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Rhodes v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Shultes v. HalpinWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Hauswirth v. Pom-ArleauWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Delsman v. BertottiWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Bleiler v. WolffWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Jamieson v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API