Legal Opinion

Hoenig v. Kohl

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1935No. 25631. Department OnePublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

This is an action for personal injuries suffered in an automobile collision. The case was tried to a jury. A verdict favorable to the plaintiff was re turned, and thereafter the court granted a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto and entered a judgment dismissing the action. The plaintiff has appealed.

There was sufficient evidence to sustain a verdict based upon the negligence of the driver of respondents ’ car, and it is apparent that the ruling of the trial court was based upon the contributory negligence of the appellant. We shall therefore discuss only such facts as bear upon that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martin v. HadenfeldtWashington Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Billingsley v. Rovig-Temple Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Shultes v. HalpinWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Hefner v. PatteeWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Tobias v. RainwaterWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Roberts v. LeahyWashington Supreme Court · 1950

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API