Kelly v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge LEAVITT.
Raheem Calvin Kelly petitions for review of the September 7, 2005, order of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) denying administrative relief from his maximum sentence date, which was calculated by the Board after Kelly was recommitted as a convicted parole violator. Kelly contends that in calculating his maximum sentence date, the Board should have given him credit for the time he spent in county custody prior to trial and sentencing on the new conviction that caused his recommitment.
On August 13, 2002, the Board paroled Kelly from a six-year prison…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gaito v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Martin v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Melhorn v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Feilke v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Armbruster v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007