Germann v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTH, P.
Petitioner Keith Germann seeks review (Lab. Code, § 5950 et seq.) of the finding by respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) that respondent Edward C. Castro (applicant) was Germann’s employee for purposes of the Workers’ Compensation Act at the time applicant sustained an injury on February 11, 1976. Germann contends applicant was not his employee but an independent contractor and therefore Germann is not liable for payment to applicant for workers’ compensation benefits. We agree and annul the WCAB’s decision. 1
I
The facts herein are not in substantial dispute.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Perguica v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Bates v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Johnson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Greenaway v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- California Compensation Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- DuBois v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Alexander v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Briggs v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Fernando Ruiz v. Affinity Logistics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.