Legal Opinion
Marrale v. Gwinnett Place Ford
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 20, 2005No. A04A2341PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Barnes, Judge.
William Marrale appeals the grant of summary judgment to Gwinnett Place Ford on his claims of fraud and violation of the Fair Business Practices Act (“FBPA”) arising from his purchase of a used automobile.
1. In this State,
[t]he standards applicable to motions for summary judgment are announced in Lau’s Corp. v. Haskins, 261 Ga. 491 (405 SE2d 474) (1991). When a trial court rules on a motion for summary judgment, the opposing party should be given the benefit of all reasonable doubt, and the court should construe the evidence and all inferences and conclusions therefrom most…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Zeeman v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Crews v. Cisco Bros. Ford-Mercury, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Catrett v. Landmark Dodge, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Regency Nissan, Inc. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- 1st Nationwide Collection Agency, Inc. v. WernerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Paulk v. Thomasville Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Sandy Springs Toyota, Inc. v. Nadia Karoline AlvearCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- American Family Life Assurance Co. v. Intervoice, Inc.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 2009
- BROWN v. MEDSCOPE AMERICA CORPORATIONDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.