Legal Opinion

Churchill v. Central Aroostook Ass'n for Retarded Citizens, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 22, 1999PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.

[¶ 1] The employee, Catherine Churchill, appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board granting her petition to determine the extent of permanent impairment related to a 1995 aggravation of a 1985 Massachusetts work-injury. Churchill contends that the Board erred when it concluded that separate injuries suffered by the employee on different dates, when both those injuries contribute to the permanent impairment of the employee, cannot be combined to determine whether the impairment exceeds the 11.8% threshold, above which employees can receive more than 260-weeks of partial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dumond v. Aroostook Van LinesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  2. Estabrook v. Steward Read Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930
  3. Campbell v. Bates Fabrics, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  4. Clark v. International Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  5. Boehm v. American Falcon Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bernier v. Data General Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  2. Harvey v. H.C. Price Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  3. Buckley v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  4. Kotch v. American Protective Services, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  5. Abbott v. School Administrative District No. 53Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API