Legal Opinion

Baker v. State Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1897PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From Multnomah: E. D. Shattuck, Judge. M. E. Baker sued the State Insurance Company, of Salem, Oregon, on a policy of fire insurance, and recovered a judgment for the full amount claimed, from which defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Wolverton.

This is an action upon a policy of insurance to recover a fire loss of $400 on a dwelling and $200 on household furniture. The defense interposed is that plaintiff by her written application, and as an inducement for the issuance of the policy of insurance, made . answers to certain inquiries touching the value of the building and land upon which it is situate, and the ownership and title of the land, in substance as fol*43lows: Q. What is the actual cash value of your land and buildings thereon? A. $1,000. Q, Are you the sole and undisputed owner of said lands…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hough v. City Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1860
  2. Phenix Insurance v. PickelIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Lebanon Mutual Insurance v. ErbSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  4. East Texas Fire Insurance v. DychesTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Bonham v. Iowa Central InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Arkansas Ins. Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Connecticut Fire Insurance v. Colorado Leasing, Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  3. Waller v. City of New York Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Vancouver Nat. Bank v. Law Union & Crown Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1907
  5. Fagg v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API