Legal Opinion

People v. Lindholm

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 19, 1979No. 28503PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rovira

This is an interlocutory appeal, brought by the People under C.A.R. 4.1, to review a ruling of the district court granting the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. The basis for the defendant’s challenge was that the evidence was illegally seized in violation of his rights under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, U.S. Const, amend. IV. We reverse the trial court’s suppression order.

On May 19, 1978, the Colorado Bureau of Investigation (CBI) was requested to assist the Clear Creek County Sheriff in the investigation of a death in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. DaileySupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. People v. HeartySupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  3. People v. BallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  4. People v. NobleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  5. United States v. Guy Mickey McNulty George O'brien, Theodore Tulper, Donald Staadts, James Nestoff and Dennis ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API