Legal Opinion

United States v. Guy Mickey McNulty George O'brien, Theodore Tulper, Donald Staadts, James Nestoff and Dennis Valley

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 5, 1984No. 81-2116 to 81-2119, 81-2130 and 81-2131PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDON J. ANDERSON, District Judge.

Because I find that the wiretap order issued by Colorado District Court Judge Robert F. Kelly complied with the requirements of the Colorado wiretapping statute, as well as the federal statute, I find it unnecessary to reach the question addressed by Judge Doyle. Since the order complied with both statutes, it is not necessary to determine which statute applies in order to determine the result in this case.

The court below suppressed the evidence obtained pursuant to the state judge’s wiretap order, on the grounds that the order did not comply with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Calvin D. RahnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. ScibelliCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. William F. GerardiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  4. People v. LindholmSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  5. People v. MilnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. United States v. BascaroCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. CharlesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Gary Savaiano, and Gary McPherson and Bill CrummeyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Glen Butz Danner L. BooneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API