Legal Opinion
CIT Corporation v. Haynes
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided August 5, 1965PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarden, J.
On appeal from decree of a single justice on jury waived hearing.
On October 9, 1961 defendant purchased under conditional sales agreement from vendor in Lewiston, a mobile power crane. Among the terms of the conditional sales contract it was provided that “to the extent permitted by law” the vendor or its assigns might repossess the equipment, without notice or legal process, “retain all prior payments as partial compensation for its use, and equipment may be sold with or without notice at private sale or at public sale,” the proceeds of such sale less expense of repossession, repair, etc.,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Crowe v. . Liquid Carbonic Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Desseau v. HolmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Mack International Motor Truck Corp. v. Thelen Trucking Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Mercier v. Nashua Buick Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
- Commerce Union Bank v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Atlas Thrift Co. v. HoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Hall v. Owen County State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Wilmington Trust Co. v. ConnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
- Dehahn v. InnesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- Camden National Bank v. St. ClairSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.