Legal Opinion

Weiner v. Targan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1930No. Appeal 352PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn/J.,

In view of the serious nature of the charges made by defendant in bis petition to open the judgment, we may perhaps express regret that plaintiff did not file an answer to the petition, so that, after depositions in support of their claims by the respective parties, the merits of the controversy might have been finally considered on the facts; instead, we can now deal only with defendant’s averments to the effect that the judgment was procured by fraud on the court below and on the defendant, alleged to have been perpetrated by plaintiff, his counsel, defendant’s insurer and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brassil v. . Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Malley v. American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Willetts v. WillettsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Moses v. Ferrel & Indemnity Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Spector v. GreensteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Cowden v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Iron Mountain Security Storage Corp. v. American Specialty Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Berry v. Anderson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1986
  5. Birth Center v. St. Paul Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API