Birth Center v. St. Paul Companies, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentZappala, Justice
I must respectfully dissent on the grounds that a claim for bad faith refusal to settle sounds in tort, not in contract. Therefore, the only viable action available to Appellee regarding Appellants’ bad faith refusal to settle is an action in tort. The remedies available to Appellee consist of the recovery of: (1) the excess verdict pursuant to common law, see Cowden v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 389 Pa. 459, 134 A.2d 223 (1957); and (2) interest, punitive damages, court costs and attorney fees pursuant to the bad faith statute, see 42 Pa.C.S. § 8371. Since consequential damages are not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gedeon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Gray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Cowden v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Sensenig v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Sniderman v. NeroneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.