Spector v. Greenstein
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Trexler, J.,
Defendant was represented by counsel who participated in the selection of the jury. After the jury was selected the court adjourned. The next morning when the case was called defendant’s counsel addressed the trial judge as follows: “If your Honor please, yesterday I was retained in this case and was asked to comé into this case and try it, with the promise of a retainer of my fee this morning and the papers to go over. I have received neither, nor am I prepared to try this case, and rather than place myself in that position I will ask your Honor to allow me to…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Cascella v. Jay James Camera Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance v. Radcliffe On Delaware, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Novinger v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Novinger, Kevin and Novinger, Darlene v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., Inc., Mercedes-Benz of North America Inc., Daimler-Benz Antien Gesell Schaft, Glasurite Gmbh, Basf Farber & Farsern Ag and General Motors Corp. v. Lesonal-Werke and Dr. Kurt Herberts Co. Gmbh and Original Imports, Inc. And Richard-Yale Industries, Inc. Appeal of Steven M. Kramer, Esq., Charles J. Geffen, Esq. And Lee C. Swartz, Esq., in No. 86-5216. Appeal of William T. Smith, Esquire, in No. 86-5248Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Cohen AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.