Legal Opinion
Baran v. Presbyterian University Hospital
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 12, 1984No. Civ. A. No. 82-2166PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MARSH, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Anthony C. Baran, has filed a motion for new trial pursuant to Rule 59, Fed.R.Civ.P.
*273Plaintiff was treated for heart trouble at Presbyterian University Hospital by Randolph A. Miller, M.D. and Barry Uretsky, M.D. Subsequent to said treatment, plaintiff filed a malpractice action against the hospital and doctors. A directed verdict was granted on behalf of the hospital and the case was submitted to the jury by special verdict on the issue of the negligence of the doctors.1
In his motion for new trial, plaintiff alleged that the verdict was against…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sindler v. GoldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Keith v. Van Dorn Plastic Machinery Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Williams v. Thomas Jefferson UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tzystuck v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Jenkins v. Whittaker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Wakeford v. Rodehouse Restaurants of Missouri, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- MacDonald v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Diminskis v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.