Legal Opinion

Diminskis v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 27, 1987No. 85-2912PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Linn

Defendant Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) brings this appeal seeking reversal of a jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, Victor and Elizabeth Diminskis, and against the CTA. The Diminskis’ instituted their personal injury suit following an accident in which a bus owned and operated by the CTA struck and seriously injured Victor. Victor’s action charged the CTA with negligence while Elizabeth sought recovery for the loss of Victor’s consortium. At the close of the trial, the jury awarded Victor and Elizabeth $400,000 each.

On appeal, the CTA contends that a new trial should be ordered.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Krupp v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Northern Trust Co. v. County of CookAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Henderson v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Roark v. MusgraveAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. M. I. G. Investments, Inc. v. MarsalaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tzystuck v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Ryan v. Mobil Oil Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. Dugan v. WeberAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. Cleveland Wrecking Co. v. Central National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. McGuckin v. Chicago Union StationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API