Legal Opinion

In Re the Reinstatement of Holden

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 11, 2003No. SCBD 4739PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoudreau, J.

T1 Petitioner, Darril Lonnie Holden, Sr., was suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years and one day by this Court on July 17, 1996. State ex rel. Oklohoma Bar Assoc. v. Holden, 1996 OK 88, 925 P.2d 32. His name was stricken from the Roll of Attorneys on September 10, 1997. Petitioner now seeks reinstatement to membership in the Oklahoma Bar Association (Bar) and requests that his name be added to the Roll of Attorneys.

T2 After conducting a hearing, the Professional Responsibility Tribunal (PRT) unanimously recommended that Petitioner be granted reinstatement. The PRT found…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Reinstatement of KaminsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. HoldenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. In Re the Reinstatement of McConnelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Reinstatement of KerrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  2. In Re the Reinstatement of MunsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  3. In Re the Reinstatement of MuminaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  4. In Re Reinstatement of PacenzaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  5. In re the Reinstatement of GoldenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API