In re the Reinstatement of Golden
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT IS DENIED; APPLICANT IS ORDERED TO PAY COSTS.
WATT, J.
1 We imposed the most severe of disciplines on the applicant effective December 83, 2007, disbarring1 Golden and removing his name from the Roll of Attorneys. These sanctions arose from Golden's having pled guilty to the federal felony charge of misprision.2 His actions resulted in significant economic harm to many individuals and to the health care system as a whole, embarrassment to the legal profession and to this Court, and an undermining of public confidence in the Bar Association and its members.3
12 Upon de…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Matter of Reinstatement of KaminsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Matter of Reinstatement of CantrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Suell v. DerricottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Michael Gerard ReillySupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- In re the Reinstatement of OgleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- IN RE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF TUNELLSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Amended November 8, 2016 Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Michael Gerard ReillySupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- IN RE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF TUNELLSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.