Legal Opinion

MURASKO v. Loo

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 2011No. SCPW-11-0000030Published

1Per curiam

In this original proceeding, petitioners Matthew Murasko, Alane Podoll, and Kyle Podoll petition this court for a writ of mandamus directing respondent the Honorable Rhonda I.L. Loo (the respondent judge) to vacate a November 17, 2010 order granting respondents Pat Curell and Rosineli Curell a new trial on petitioners’ petition for an injunction against harassment. The respondent judge granted a new trial after extending the ten-day period for seeking such relief under District Court Rules of Civil Procedure (DCRCP) Rule 59(b).

Based on the following, we hold that DCRCP Rule 6(b) prohibits a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Kema v. GaddisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Wolfsohn v. HankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Harold Yanow v. Weyerhaeuser Steamship Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  5. Escritor v. Maui County Council, Ltd.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API