Legal Opinion

Asbestos Workers Local No. 23 Pension Fund Ex Rel. Norcross v. United States

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 2004No. 1:01-cv-02253PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CONNER, District Judge.

Presently before the court in this inter-pleader action are cross-motions for summary judgment by defendants, Patrick Kelíey and the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), seeking disbursement of payments owed under a pension benefit plan administered by plaintiff, Asbestos Workers Local No. 23 Pension Fund (“Fund”), and governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1401. Patrick Kelley, named as designated beneficiary under the plan, became entitled to a guaranteed amount of benefits following the death of his father, Richard…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Egelhoff v. Egelhoff Ex Rel. BreinerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. United States v. BessSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Marie Saldana v. Kmart Corporation Marie Saldana, in No. 99-4055Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pappas v. City of LebanonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Popky v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Pappas v. City of LebanonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API