Legal Opinion

Brotherton Co. v. Jackson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1925No. Docket No. 10PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, C. J.

Plaintiff brings error to review the judgment of the circuit judge in quashing certain writs of garnishment. The plaintiff began suit by attachment against William J. Jackson on the 22d day of November, 1923, and on the same day the sheriff attached a Studebaker sedan, belonging to the defendant, and stored it with William K. Johnson, who was doing business as Olympic Wrecked Auto Service. On January 28, 1924, the attachment was dissolved by order of the circuit judge and the sheriff was directed to restore the attached property to the defendant “after the expiration of five days from the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gunn v. GunnMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Vyse v. RichardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Pagenkoff v. Patrons' Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Jewell v. LamoreauxMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Recor v. St. Clair Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Joy v. Two-Bit CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. State Ex Rel. Hurd v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Wayne Pump Co. v. Gross Income Tax Div.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Cyrowski v. WojcikMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Oreland Equipment Co. v. Copco Steel & Engineering Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API