Legal Opinion
United States v. 1980 Lear Jet, Model 35A, Serial Number 277
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 31, 1994No. 92-16989PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAVY, Circuit Judge.
The holder of a mechanic’s lien against property subject to forfeiture appeals from that portion of the district court’s judgment denying costs, fees, and interest on the lien principal, arguing that the district court erred by concluding that an innocent lien-holder was not entitled to interest under federal forfeiture law. For the reasons which follow, we reverse and remand.
FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
On April 13, 1989, Aero Servicios Ejecuti-vos Sinaloenses, S.A. de C.V. (“ASES”), a Mexican corporation and owner of a 1980 Lear Jet airplane (“jet”), entered into a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Carl and Mary Shelden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- David C. Mapes, Jr. Nancy Dodds Mary Gail Hentzen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Employer's Mutual Casualty Co. v. McKeonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Ernst & Young v. Matsumoto (In re United Insurance Management, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Jackson C. O'dell, Iii, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Alcaraz-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Sung Jin KimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. 9844 South Titan Court, Unit 9Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Hosep Krikor Bajakajian, Aka: Joe BajakajianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.