Legal Opinion
United States v. 9844 South Titan Court, Unit 9
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 5, 1996No. Nos. 94-1285, 94-1290PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY, Circuit Judge.
Claimants Philip and Frances May appeal a summary judgment granted to the government in a civil forfeiture proceeding initiated under 21 U.S.C. § 881 and completed after Philip May’s conviction and sentencing on related drug charges. Ms. May challenges the district court’s conclusion that her “innocent owner” defense did not survive the government’s motion for summary judgment. Mr. May contends that forfeiture in a pro*1475ceeding separate from his criminal trial constituted double jeopardy. There is merit in both arguments. We reverse in part the judgment of the district…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Richison v. Ernest Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. HardwellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Brannon L. HatchettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Various Computers and Computer Equipment, Paris Francis LundisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Ronald N. Totaro, Adrienne Totaro, Interested Party-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.