Legal Opinion
Ernst & Young v. Matsumoto (In re United Insurance Management, Inc.)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 20, 1994No. 92-16397PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
Ernst & Young appeals a district court order remanding the bankruptcy court’s summary judgment with instructions to determine whether the doctrine of equitable tolling preserves the claims of chapter 7 debtor United Insurance Management, Inc. despite expiration of the Bankruptcy Code’s statute of limitations. Because the doctrine of equitable tolling is inapplicable as a matter of law on undisputed facts in the record, we reverse the district court and reinstate the bankruptcy court’s summary judgment.
I
In 1981, Robert J. Keller purchased United Insurance…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re H. Frank Dominguez, Debtor. H. Frank Dominguez v. David D. Miller Denyse M. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Acequia, Inc. v. Clinton (In re Acequia, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. 1980 Lear Jet, Model 35A, Serial Number 277Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Wiersma v. O.H. Kruse Grain & Milling (In Re Wiersma)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Leslie Gladstone v. US BancorpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.