Legal Opinion

Bringhurst v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Emmet. (Ramsdell, J.) Ejectment. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

The plaintiff brought ejectment, claiming title in fee to the parcel of land described in his declaration. He did not show actual possession or occupancy, but depended entirely upon paper title, which he showed beyond question to an undivided half of the premises. He failed to prove title to the other undivided half.

The land in dispute is in the possession and occupation of defendant as a track for railroad purposes. Prior to 1881, the Bay View, Little Traverse & Mackinac Eailroad Company constructed its road upon and over the land in question, and had actual possession thereof. While so in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hinman v. BoothNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  2. Reilly v. BlaserMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Renwick v. NoggleMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Hoban v. CableMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Board of Supervisors v. Ionia Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Retan v. SherwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Ford v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API