Legal Opinion
State v. Maxwell
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 2002No. 2000-1812PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 95 Ohio St.3d 254.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. MAXWELL, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Maxwell,
2002-Ohio-2121.] Criminal law—Sex offenses—Pandering obscenity involving a minor—Proper reading of R.C. 2907.321(A)(6) demonstrates the clear intent of the General Assembly to impose strict liability on the act of bringing child pornography into the state—R.C. 2907.321, construed and applied. (No. 2000-1812—Submitted October 30, 2001—Decided May 15, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-1177.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Provident Bank v. WoodOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Columbus-Suburban Coach Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. WacOhio Supreme Court · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- State v. HornerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. PariagOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. LozierOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. DunlapOhio Supreme Court · 2011
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.