Commonwealth v. Doranzo
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This is an appeal by the Commonwealth from an order granting a petition to return property. The record is too incomplete to permit a sensible decision. The order will therefore be reversed and the case remanded for a new hearing, so that a proper record may be made.
In its brief the Commonwealth asserts that it “presented] strong evidence which compels the inference that the hundreds of items stored by this admitted fence [appellee] were stolen and, therefore, constitute contraband ----” Reply Brief for Commonwealth at 3.
Two detectives testified at the hearing. Detective Thomas…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Dwight v. Girard Medical CenterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Nixon v. NixonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. DoranzoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Com. v. Ash, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Com. v. Williams, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.