Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Doranzo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 23, 1987No. 1368PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This appeal, by the Commonwealth, is from an order granting appellee’s petition to return property. The Commonwealth argues that the petition was improperly granted in light of the fact that appellee pled guilty to. 47 counts of receiving stolen property and the property subject to the petition was commingled with items appellee admitted were contraband.

Because we find that the trial court, in effect, imposed an improper burden upon the Commonwealth, we reverse the order in question.

Appellee had been suspected by the Philadelphia Police Department of running an illegal “fencing”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LandySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. In re MagliscoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. DoranzoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JandaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. $32,950.00 U.S. Currency Seized From Safe Deposit Box No. 437 Meridian BankCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. YoungeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. Fidelity Bank AccountsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. JohnsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API