Legal Opinion

Torgelson v. . Real Property Known as 17138 880th Ave., Renville County

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 22, 2008No. A06-1507, A06-1757PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RUSSELL A. ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

We are asked in this appeal to decide whether Minnesota’s drug asset forfeiture statute, Minn.Stat. § 609.5311, subd. 2 (2006), is constitutional as applied to homestead property. Appellants, county attorneys for Renville and Yellow Medicine counties, obtained judgment of forfeiture of respondents’ homestead properties under the drug asset forfeiture statute. In a consolidated appeal, the court of appeals reversed. We affirm, holding that the Minnesota Constitution precludes the forfeitures of respondents’ homestead properties.

The facts in this case…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Butterworth v. CaggianoSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  4. United States v. Thomas Lee Curtis, United States of America v. Patty M. Thompson, United States of America v. Patty M. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  5. Denzer v. PrendergastSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sargent v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Nielsen v. 2003 Honda AccordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. Rooney v. RooneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Running v. Dolan (In re Goodspeed)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
  5. Thao v. Command Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API