Legal Opinion

State v. One 1965 Red Chevrolet Pickup, VIN/C1445S172380

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 9, 2001No. 93,354PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.

¶ 1 The dispositive issue presented on cer-tiorari is whether the legislative exemption of certain automobiles from forced sale (upon execution or other court-issued process) for satisfaction of a debt bars the State from invoking in this case the statute that authorizes the forfeiture of property used in the commission of a crime. We answer in the negative.

I

THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION

T2 By invoking the provisions of 21 0.8. Supp.1993 § 1738 (A), 2 the State of Oklahoma [State] sought on 28 January 1999 forfeiture of a 1965 red Chevrolet pickup truck, VIN/C1445§172880. Notice was sent to the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. The PalmyraSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  5. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Racher v. Westlake Nursing Home Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  2. McCathern v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  3. In Re JLMSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  4. State Ex Rel. Prater v. 2010 Toyota Corolla, VIN 1NXBU4EE4AZ313776Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
  5. Duncan v. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API