Legal Opinion

Dayton v. Landon

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 2, 1961No. Civ. 24695PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVallee, J.

Appeal by plaintiffs from an adverse judgment entered on a jury verdict in an action for damages for *742personal injuries to plaintiff Frances Dayton and for damage to plaintiffs’ automobile.

Stating the evidence in the light most favorable to defendant, the facts are: About 4 p. m. on November 12, 1957, plaintiff Frances Dayton, having finished work at a Douglas Aircraft plant, drove out of the company parking lot alone in a Plymouth automobile onto the company's private road. Many other employees were leaving the plant; the traffic on the private road was “bumper to bumper”; everyone was going…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. People v. KlinkenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. In Re Estate of NuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Austin v. NewtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Trancoso v. TrancosoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rainer v. Community Memorial HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Jorgenson v. DronebargerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Lubeck v. LopesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Philpott v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Abney v. CoalwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API