Legal Opinion
Eastland Financial Services v. Mendoza
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided January 25, 2002No. 21,125PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
{1} Mid-Continent Casualty Company (Mid-Continent) appeals the trial court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment and the granting of summary judgment in favor of Eastland Financial Services (Eastland). Mid-Continent, as surety for MC Builders, a general contractor, was held liable for MC Builders’ breach of contract and was summarily ordered to reimburse Eastland from a payment bond issued pursuant to NMSA 1978, § 13-4-18 (1987). Mid-Continent alleges that Eastland was not entitled to recover under the bond because (1) Eastland was not licensed under New…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Asdourian v. ArajCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Jackson National Life Insurance v. RececoniNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- New Mexico Physicians Mutual Liability Co. v. LaMureNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Memorial Medical Center, Inc. v. Tatsch Construction, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reliance National Indemnity Co. v. Advance'd Temporaries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2007
- United States v. VanceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Tri-State Employment Services, Inc. v. Mountbatten Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Gamboa v. UrenaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- Reule Sun Corp. v. VallesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.