Legal Opinion
New Mexico Physicians Mutual Liability Co. v. LaMure
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided August 31, 1993No. 20273PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROST, Justice.
This appeal from a declaratory judgment requires us to determine whether an insurer must indemnify a physician under his medical malpractice insurance policies for liability resulting from allegations of criminal sexual assault. Plaintiff-appellee New Mexico Physicians Mutual Liability Company (the insurer) filed suit to establish nonliability for coverage under medical malpractice insurance policies issued to defendant-appellant, David S. LaMure, Sr., M.D. LaMure had been sued by Lillian Gonzalez on behalf of her minor son, Kristopher Gonzalez, for damages resulting…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Marx v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- Zipkin v. FreemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Chavez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- Hirst v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Princeton Insurance v. ChunmuangSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Gallegos v. Pueblo of TesuqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- Mock v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Lindheimer v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Slayko v. Security Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.