Legal Opinion

Northland Insurance v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1992No. S-90-020PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.

Succinctly, the issue in this case of first impression is whether under Nebraska’s State Tort Claims Act the State of Nebraska may be sued for contribution as an alleged joint tort-feasor.

In sustaining the State’s demurrer to the appellants’ petition for such relief, the district court for Dawes County held that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction because it found that a contribution claim is not a tort action under Nebraska’s State Tort Claims Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 81-8,209 et seq. (Reissue 1987). We reverse the holding of the district court and remand the cause for further proceedings.

App…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Security Investment Co. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Reese Ex Rel. Reese v. AMF-WhitelyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1976
  5. First Nat. Bank of Omaha v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hoch v. ProkopNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Johnson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Maxwell v. MonteyNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Gould v. OrrNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Rodehorst v. GartnerNebraska Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API