Legal Opinion
Rodehorst v. Gartner
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided October 10, 2003No. S-02-795, S-02-796PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephan, J.
Keith E. Rodehorst brought separate actions against Lori A. Gartner (Gartner) seeking contribution for payments which Rodehorst made to Exchange Bank (the Bank) on two promissory notes following default by Premiere Motors, L.L.C. (Premiere). The district court sustained Gartner’s demurrers and dismissed the actions, concluding as a matter of law that Rodehorst had no right to seek contribution from Gartner. Rodehorst perfected timely appeals in each case. The appeals were moved to our docket pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1106(3) (Reissue 1995) and consolidated for oral argument and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1975
- Spittler v. NicolaNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Exchange Elevator Co. v. MarshallNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
- Stahlecker v. Ford Motor Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Jackson v. Morris Communications Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Byrd v. Estate of Nelms, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
- Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation District v. Jeffrey Lake Development, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- State Ex Rel. Wagner v. Gilbane Bldg. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- BUILDERS SUPPLY CO., INC. v. CzerwinskiNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- Randles v. HansonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.