First Nat. Bank of Omaha v. State
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.
The district court sustained the demurrer of the defendant-appellee, State of Nebraska, to the third amended petition filed by the plaintiff-appellant, First National Bank of Omaha, and dismissed the suit. First National has appealed, asserting, in summary, that the district court erred in concluding that it failed to state a cause of action. We affirm.
First National instituted its suit under the provisions of the State Tort Claims Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 81-8,209 et seq. (Reissue 1987). In First Nat. Bank of Omaha v. State, 230 Neb. 259, 430 N.W.2d 893 (1988) (First Nat. Bank of Omaha I),…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Matheson v. StorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Security Investment Co. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Koepf v. County of YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
- Wickersham v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Johnson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Wicker v. VogelNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- AMISUB (Saint Joseph Hospital), Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Northland Insurance v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- D.K. Buskirk & Sons, Inc. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.