Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Omaha v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1992No. S-89-844PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

The district court sustained the demurrer of the defendant-appellee, State of Nebraska, to the third amended petition filed by the plaintiff-appellant, First National Bank of Omaha, and dismissed the suit. First National has appealed, asserting, in summary, that the district court erred in concluding that it failed to state a cause of action. We affirm.

First National instituted its suit under the provisions of the State Tort Claims Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 81-8,209 et seq. (Reissue 1987). In First Nat. Bank of Omaha v. State, 230 Neb. 259, 430 N.W.2d 893 (1988) (First Nat. Bank of Omaha I),…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Matheson v. StorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Security Investment Co. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Koepf v. County of YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Wickersham v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Wicker v. VogelNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. AMISUB (Saint Joseph Hospital), Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Northland Insurance v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. D.K. Buskirk & Sons, Inc. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API