Legal Opinion
Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co. v. Leman
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 2, 1926No. 1910PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBingham, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The first question presented by the appellant (the Krentler Company) is that Belcher, the original defendant, could not in his answer set up and maintain a counterclaim for the infringement of a patent owned by him; that under federal equity rule 30, as construed by the District Courts in this circuit, a subject-matter not arising out of the cause of complaint stated in the bill could not be set up by way of counterclaim. In support of this contention reliance is placed upon the cases of Terry Steam Turbine Co. v. B. F. Sturtevant Co. (D. C.) 204 F. 103,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States Expansion Bolt Co. v. H. G. Kroncke Hardware Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1916
- Buffalo Specialty Co. v. VancleefDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1914
- Le Sueur v. Manufacturers' Finance Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Alliance Securities Co. v. De Vilbiss Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Mendez v. BowieCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
- Heywood-Wakefield Co. v. SmallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1938
- Utah Radio Products Co. v. BoudetteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.