Legal Opinion

Dierssen v. McCormack

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 19, 1938No. Civ. 10841PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiffs sought to enjoin defendants from diverting water from a certain irrigation ditch and to recover damages. The cause was tried by the court sitting without a jury and from a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiffs appeal upon the judgment roll. The plaintiffs may be hereinafter referred to as the Dierssens; the defendants Thomas H. McCormack and Clara H. McCormack as the McCormacks; and the defendants Isador Schad and Augusta Schad, as the Sehads.

The parties are adjoining property owners on Sherman Island. All of the properties front on the north bank of the San Joaquin River at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Colegrove Water Co. v. City of HollywoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Hoyt v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Duross v. SingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Walker v. LillingstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Galletly v. BockiusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Pacific Employers Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  3. Dolske v. GormleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Guerra v. PackardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Buckler v. Davis Sand & Gravel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API