Galletly v. Bockius
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, P. J.
Action to quiet title. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant has appealed.
The land described in the complaint is the southerly twenty feet of a tract of about forty acres bordering upon the county road from Watsonville to San Jose, and extending easterly therefrom about seventeen hundred feet, and which, for convenience of reference, is styled herein as tract “A.” The plaintiff is the owner of a tract of land, herein called tract “B,” contiguous thereto and lying easterly therefrom, and the defendant is the owner of a tract, called herein tract “C,” lying…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Herman v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Wintersmith & Young v. Pointer & ConwayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
- Wells v. . TolmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Tomchak v. HarrisIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
- Stevens v. Bird-Jex Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1933
- Dierssen v. McCormackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- McBrayer v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.