Legal Opinion

Grammer v. Wiggins-Meyer Steamship Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBbown, J.

Before passing to an analysis of the evidence, we will take up the last point raised. On this subject, we note the following clear and concise statement from 2 Thompson on Trials (2 ed.), Section 2635:

“The form of the verdict as recorded must govern, in case of any discrepancy between it and the verdict which the jury actually returned into court, — the pre sumption being that the jury assented to the verdict as recorded. ’ ’

This is settled law.

Again, at 25 Stan. Ency. of Proced., page 1029, appears the following valuable excerpt:

“It is the recorded verdict, not the paper returned by a jury…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Corning v. BurdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Malloy v. Marshall-Wells Hardware Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Dunn v. Orchard Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Lang v. Camden Iron WorksOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. McGlone v. HaugerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. TURNER, ADM'R v. McCreadyOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Young v. Crown Zellerbach Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Iron Horse Engineering Co. v. Northwest Rubber Extruders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. Winters v. BisaillonOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Wells Truckways, Ltd., a California Corporation v. William A. BurchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API