Ex Parte Leaf Tobacco Board of Trade of New York
Supreme Court of the United States
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION. Motion for leave to file petition. The petitioner states in its petition that it is a corporation of the State of New York and “is composed of more than seventy-five business concerns engaged in the business of selling leaf-tobacco to manufacturers of tobacco products.
Read the full summary
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION. Motion for leave to file petition. The petitioner states in its petition that it is a corporation of the State of New York and “is composed of more than seventy-five business concerns engaged in the business of selling leaf-tobacco to manufacturers of tobacco products. That the said concerns are vitally interested, both directly on their own accgunt and indirectly on the account of the customers to whom they sell and offer to sell leaf tobacco, in the proper determination by the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York of…
1Per curiam
Leave to file petition denied.
1. One who is not a party to a record and judgment is not entitled to appeal therefrom. Bayard v. Lombard, 9 How. 530; Indiana v. Liverpool, London & Globe Ins. Co., 109 U. S. 168; Ex parte Cockroft, 104 U. S. 578.
2. The action of the court below in refusing to permit the movers to become parties to the record is not susceptible of being reviewed by this court on appeal, or indirectly, under the circumstances here disclosed, by the writ of mandamus. In re Cutting, 94 U. S. 15, and see Credits Commutation Co. v. United States, 177 U. S. 311.
3. The merely general…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Credits Commutation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Bayard v. LombardSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Brandies v. CochraneSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Elwell v. FosdickSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Ex Parte CockcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Karcher v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- The Chicago Junction CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local 283 v. ScofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.