Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Cockcroft

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 23, 1882PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Petition for a writ of mandamus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite

This' is a petition for a writ of mandamus requiring the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of South Carolina to allow an appeal by the petitioner from an order of the court entered on the 7th of October, 1881, confirming a sale of a railroad made pursuant to a decree filed on the 25th of September, 1880, in the suit of Calvin, Claflin, and Others v. The South Carolina Railroad Company and Others. The petitioner was not a party to the suit, neither does it appear that he ever asked to be made a party. • He is not the holder of any of the bonds that by the decree under which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte CuttingSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Karcher v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Grant v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Ex Parte Leaf Tobacco Board of Trade of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Elwell v. FosdickSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. United States v. SeigelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API