Legal Opinion
Standard Brands, Inc. v. Federal Yeast Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 10, 1930No. 364PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOPER, District Judge.
United States patent 1,449,103 to Hay-duck, covering a process for making bakers’ yeast, having been held valid and infringed in this court and on appeal [8 F.(2d) 186; (C. C. A.) 13 F.(2d) 570], Raymond S. Williams was appointed special master at the request of the parties to ascertain the profits and damages payable by the defendant. Before the master’s report was filed, a second suit by plaintiff against defendant was filed and heard upon three other patents involving yeast processes of the same inventor, to wit, United States patents 1,449,102, 1,449,105, and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Seymour v. McCormickSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- The Suffolk Company v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Dobson v. DornanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Manufacturing Co. v. CowingSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Activated Sludge v. Sanitary Dist. of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1946
- Amerace Esna Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Mathey v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1944
- Schick Dry Shaver, Inc. v. R. H. Macy & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Austral Sales Corp. v. Jamestown Metal Equipment Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.