Legal Opinion

Austral Sales Corp. v. Jamestown Metal Equipment Co.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided September 20, 1941No. 2010PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, District Judge.

This is a patent infringement suit. The matter now before the court arises on exceptions to the Special Master’s report filed herein. The reference to a Special Master was made following the entry of a consent decree. Such decree enumerates twenty claims of Patent No. 1,956,277; five claims of Patent No. 1,977,474; and two claims of Patent No. 1,983,125, as valid and infringed by the defendant. The aforesaid patents relate to schoolroom wardrobes and hardware therefor. The reference to the Master directed him “to fix and state the amount of the gains, profits, benefits…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. The Suffolk Company v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  3. Marsh v. Nichols, Shepard & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Collins v. Hupp Motor Car CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
  5. Merrell Soule Co. v. Powdered Milk Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Collins v. KraftDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API