Simek v. Tate

VOIGT, Chief Justice.

[T1] This is an appeal from a district court order enforcing an oral settlement agreement requiring the appellant (Simek) to purchase certain real property from the ap-pellee (the Estate) 1 We conclude that the district court did not err in determining that partial performance by the Estate made the settlement agreement enforceable despite the statute of frauds, and we therefore affirm.

ISSUES

[12] 1. Did the district court err in denying Simek's motion for an additional "live" evidentiary hearing, and holding a telephonic hearing instead?

2. Did the district court err in…