Legal Opinion
Gould v. Ochsner
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided August 5, 2015No. S-14-0228PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Justice.
[T1] James Gould, IV, his wife, and their two children, brought an action against Daniel Ochsner and his related ranch entities, asserting claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, conversion and fraud. Plaintiffs' claims stemmed from promises Defendant Daniel Ochsner allegedly made during Plaintiffs' several-year tenure living and working on Defendants' Flying River Ranch. Following a bench trial, the district court denied all of Plaintiffs' claims and Defendants' counterclaims. Plaintiffs appeal, contending that the district court erred in denying their claims to a…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Green Country Food Market, Inc. v. Bottling Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Harber v. JensenWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Cross v. Berg Lumber CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Piroschak v. WhelanWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Ekberg v. SharpWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mantle v. N. Star Energy & Constr. LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Joyce Halling and Medcon Inc., a Utah corporation v. David A. Yovanovich and Ornella Dalla BonaWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Larson v. Burton Constr., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- In the Matter of the Phyllis V. Mcdill Revocable Trust: Thomas P. Mcdill, Jr., In His Individual Capacity as Beneficiary and Successor Trustee of the Phyliss Mcdill Revocable Trust. v. Michael G. Mcdill, In His Individual Capacity as Beneficiary of the Phyliss Mcdill Revocable TrustWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
- Patricia Kappes, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lula M. Tanner v. Diana Rhodes and Rhodes Law Firm, LlcWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.