Legal Opinion

Lykins v. HABITAT FOR HUMANITY

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2010No. S-10-0045PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Justice.

[11] In litigation disputing the ownership of a residential property in Casper, Wyoming, a default judgment was entered against the Appellants, Jim Lykins and Jill M. Sellars, and in favor of the Appellee, Habitat for Humanity. Mr. Lykins and Ms. Sellars moved to set aside the default judgment. The district court denied the motion, and Mr. Lykins and Ms. Sellars appealed that decision. We will affirm.

ISSUES

[12] Mr. Lykins and Ms. Sellars present these issues:

1. Whether the District Court erred when it ruled that "the Defendants have failed to make the requisite showing of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Combs v. Sherry-CombsWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stadtfeld v. StadtfeldWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Carlson v. CarlsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Three Way, Inc. v. Burton Enterprises, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Capshaw v. SchieckWyoming Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rosty v. SkajWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Jennifer P. Hanft, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Bret Lee Vance v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Leah Ruth Rush v. Joseph Robert GolkowskiWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  4. In the Matter of the Termination of Parental Rights To ARW, a minor child: DRWWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Jones v. ArteryWyoming Supreme Court · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API